Application deadline: november 29, 2017
This program supports faculty professional development by providing awards to facilitate
scholarly projects that lead to public, peer-reviewed products.
The purpose of this program is to advance professional development of faculty in support
of scholarship and scholarly activities. Applicants can request support for a variety
of scholarly endeavors, including supplies or equipment to advance a scholarly project
or travel that will advance the scholarly professional development of the applicant
and lead to submission of a manuscript for peer review. Full-time AU faculty members
who have some percentage of chair-assigned faculty effort in scholarly activity are
eligible to apply. Part-time faculty members are not eligible. Criteria for evaluation of applications (see "Reviewer Guidelines" for details)
- Although travel to conferences is not excluded from eligibility, such funding is a
lower priority than activities that directly support the development or maintenance
of an active program of scholarly work. An explanation of how the travel will directly
contribute to preparation of a grant proposal, manuscript, or creative product must
- Individuals who have received awards in the past must provide evidence (e.g., reprints
of articles) of the outcomes of previous funding in order to be eligible for repeat
funding. For example, if a faculty member received funding to make a presentation
at a conference, he/she would need to provide evidence of the further development
of the project on which the presentation was based. (e.g., draft of manuscript)
- The award limit is $2000.
- Application deadline is November 29; announcement of awards will be made by December
- The award may not be used for salary support.
- Applications should be sent to Judy Cooke, Faculty Development Program Coordinator,
at Judy Cooke as one PDF document.
- Applications will be reviewed by a faculty committee using a "blind" process and a
scoring rubric. (see Scholarly Activity Award Reviewer Guidelines). The review committee will consist of faculty members who have a record of scholarship
and who do not expect to apply for an award.
- Recipients will be expected to present the results of their scholarly work in a local
venue (e.g., Faculty Development Day, CRCA).
Scholarly Activity Awards 2017
Description of the scholarly activity
- Preference should be given to activities that contribute to the progress of a scholarly
project or program and that are likely to lead to a grant proposal, a manuscript for
submission to a peer-reviewed publication, or a peer-reviewed product.
- Support for travel will only be considered if the travel will directly contribute
to the further development of the scholarly work. For example, support for travel
to present a paper would be a low priority; support for travel to collect data would
be rated more highly.
Professional development as a scholar
- The applicant should clearly articulate outcomes expected from requested support.
- The applicant should articulate actual deliverables in terms of their professional development (e.g., vita entry, grant proposal, creative
- Preference should be given to deliverables beyond a conference presentation.
Use of previous funds
- If the applicant received funds in a previous round, the applicant should provide
evidence that the support produced significant scholarly progress.
- Preference will be given to new projects, rather than projects that are simply continuing
from the previous year. We are not in the business of long-term support of a program
Summary Evaluation recommendation
- support at level requested
- offer support, but at level less than requested (recommended amount)
- do not offer support; encourage resubmission
- do not offer support